View Full Version : Nile Sus ?
archive_Iron God
11-29-2000, 07:42 AM
Got some Nile SUS the othe rday and got 3 different marked and looking amps
The other two I beleive are real
These I beleive to be suspect
http://www.************.com/members/irongod/fake.jpg
The amps sizes vary but the writing is silk screened on and does not rub off..let me what know you fellas think
Yes those are fake, but there are nile sust that look like that which are real. The nile co is very strange, they keep changing their labelling and have incredibly varied amp sizes. Now all you can really do is have trust in your source, that's why with niles having an excellent source is mandatory.
http://bobjewson.tripod.com/e2.jpg
archive_Iron God
11-29-2000, 11:05 AM
Thanks E2
IG
archive_FitnessChick
11-29-2000, 12:00 PM
Okay---ours look exactly like that, however, the writing around the circle doesn't look quite as choppy----as IG stated, there are 2 other kinds that we are sure are real---our source hasn't ever screwed us before...hmmmmmm...anymore opinins?
Yes the ones i have like that are a darker green writing as well, more of a dark forest green, oooo E2 the decorator... heh heh.
http://bobjewson.tripod.com/e2.jpg
archive_FitnessChick
11-29-2000, 12:17 PM
you have mail
archive_FitnessChick
11-29-2000, 12:37 PM
okay---upon looking at the "questionable ones"- I discovered 2 types among them----a few (4) looked to be darker in color ever so slightly---the oval with organon in it is more oval then round, and the writing isn'tas choppy.....Then the other batch has slightly lighter green writing, thinner-choppier writing, & the circle is more round then oval.
Going to do the freezer test with one of each kind---will updat in a few minutes...
ezes101
11-29-2000, 12:44 PM
I've gotten hundreds of niles from our good friend and once I questioned the difference in size etc..
and this was his responce well part of it any way
"Niles, in General, are very inconsistent. The government here sets the prices
for all medication, not the companies. When a product is underpriced, the
company has to save some money off production so it can at least break even
and not lose money on the product. Quality control would never allow any
tampering with the medication or the vehicle in which it is carried ( the
oily solution). So the companies save on the packaging and printing. Even
the outside box, the printed insert and the protective plastic for the ampoules
are of very poor quality.
never had a problem with any of the ones i've gotten.
eze
FC the freezer test only works on cetain base oils, in which the saturation point of testosterone is almost at it's peak in that specific base oil. For instance some base oils may be able to have 350mg of test suspended in them, while others will only allow 250mg, these points are saturation points. When an oil is close to saturation point, and you cool it down, then the solubility properties of the oil go down, and testosterone precipitates out, giving the cloudy solution. That's why it's unreliable, if it passes then you know it's real, if it doesn't then it still may be real.
http://bobjewson.tripod.com/e2.jpg
archive_FitnessChick
11-29-2000, 01:08 PM
okay--all passed---I guess they just have some serious inconsistancies in their labelling...thanks for al your help!!!!!
WarLobo
11-29-2000, 04:48 PM
Damn... NOT THE NILES again! No.......
I will not even think about using these any more.
Went through this BS last year and I swore I didn't need the hassle.
I'm thinking if they can't even get the damn lables and amps SOMEWHAT consistant than I'm sure as hell not going to pump that liquid in. Especailly not with so many good alternative these days (Like some of that ** sust :P j/k)
LAte
Lobo
Powered by vBulletin™ Version 4.0.6 Copyright © 2012 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.