Cycle idea.

Riker29 · 06-21-2004, 01:44 AM

A friend of mine and I were discussing this and I wanted to get some input.

First, why not do low-dose morning D-Bol by itself? Even not as part of PCT but just as a "boost" for someone that was not recovering and wasn’t on anything else (except maybe, what I mention in my second point below). In theory it would not shut you down, and would have a fairly low risk of any problems. Just 10 mg a day, in the morning.

Second, I remember seeing a study that said that taking Arimidex by itself can raise Test in one’s system by up to 50%. So it’s kind of a pseudo-booster because it ends up raising your own body’s levels of Test. But the problem with Arimidex is that it is NOT good for lipids - I wonder if anyone knows if any other anti-aromitaze drugs (i.e. Letrazole?) has this same Test-boosting effect (but is not as hard in the lipid profile)?

So, maybe taking a bit of AM D-Bol, and some Arimidex-like thing that raises Test, maybe this would be a good "kick" of sort and not really require any type of PCT?

What do you guys think?

archive_Ulter · 06-21-2004, 08:14 AM

Yes that would work, I have done it.

"Education is what remains after one has forgotten everything he learned in school." -Albert Einstein

SteelPreacher · 06-21-2004, 08:19 AM

Im doing it right now. Look down the page of threads

Winners see problems as just another way to prove themselves! D.T.

Riker29 · 06-21-2004, 12:30 PM

Yes, the low-dose D-Bol idea seems like it works, cool.

I was wondering about the anti-E as a way to enhance Test, and what anti-E would work best without being too hard on the lipids? (I know Arimidex works but it's a bit harsh).

(read the second point in my original post).

archive_Ulter · 06-21-2004, 01:19 PM

I have seen too many posts both ways about using anti-e's this way. Some research shows it works and other research shows it doesn't. Some people like it, some say it did nothing for them. So I don't post one way or the other. It's not that I didn't read the question. I don't have a definitive answer. If you want to try it then Aromasin is better from a lipid profile standpoint.

"Education is what remains after one has forgotten everything he learned in school." -Albert Einstein

06-21-2004, 08:14 AM	#2 (permalink)
archive_Ulter Senior Member Join Date: Nov 2000 Posts: 15,388 Rep Power: 21906	Yes that would work, I have done it. "Education is what remains after one has forgotten everything he learned in school." -Albert Einstein __________________

06-21-2004, 08:19 AM	#3 (permalink)
SteelPreacher Senior Member Join Date: May 2002 Posts: 1,091 Rep Power: 5936	Im doing it right now. Look down the page of threads Winners see problems as just another way to prove themselves! D.T. __________________ I can make you a celebrity overnight. Winners see problems as just another way to prove themselves! D.T.

06-21-2004, 01:19 PM	#5 (permalink)
archive_Ulter Senior Member Join Date: Nov 2000 Posts: 15,388 Rep Power: 21906	I have seen too many posts both ways about using anti-e's this way. Some research shows it works and other research shows it doesn't. Some people like it, some say it did nothing for them. So I don't post one way or the other. It's not that I didn't read the question. I don't have a definitive answer. If you want to try it then Aromasin is better from a lipid profile standpoint. "Education is what remains after one has forgotten everything he learned in school." -Albert Einstein __________________

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

Helpful links suggested by members
ResearchStop	Research Chemicals
Cycles for Pennies a day by DC	The original thread by Dogg Crapp aka Dante
Pubmed	National Institute of Health Public Library.
Real Sports Report on Steroids	The truth about steroids that only HBO would present. MP4 Large file. Use Real Player
Merck Medical Manual	Merck manual of medical information
AAS: Mechanism of Action and Effects on Performance	Encyclopedia of Sports Medicine and Science California State Univ. Explanation of AAS effects on athletes
Carlorie King	The world's largest food database
ExRx Exercise and Muscle Directory	Exercises by muscle parts and vice versa. Includes video of popular exercises.
Wholesale Hair Products	Nizoral and other hair products
USDA National Nutrient Database	The nutritional value of all foods.
Fitday.com	Detailed Nutrition for 1,000's of foods with macro breakdowns
List of brand names for drugs	What various drugs are called by name brands around the world.
Getpinz.com	Medical and lab supplies
Health Tests Direct	Blood tests by mail without a prescription

06-21-2004, 12:30 PM	#4 (permalink)
Riker29 Senior Member Join Date: Feb 2001 Posts: 247 Rep Power: 6014	Yes, the low-dose D-Bol idea seems like it works, cool. I was wondering about the anti-E as a way to enhance Test, and what anti-E would work best without being too hard on the lipids? (I know Arimidex works but it's a bit harsh). (read the second point in my original post).