Quote:
Originally Posted by Bjaarki
How is that? You can be apt and inexperienced (like Abraham Lincoln), inept and experienced (like Lyndon Johnson), apt and experienced (like Franklin Roosevelt), or inept and inexperienced (like George W. Bush). The charge of "Ineptitude" is not supported by the charge of "Inexperience". I asked you for an example that supports the "facts" you supposedly adduced, and you come back with this? Oh man. You're not getting off to a very good start here.
Okay. I guess that Senator Obama's life began when he won his senate seat.
Just your "personal opinion'? No way. You said these are "facts," bro. You said, quoting you now, "That is not mud throwing. That is fact throwing." And now you tell us your "fact" is "just my personal opinion." Heh heh. It's a bitch when someone holds you to account for your words, isn't it?
Okay. If that is your definition of "lack of guts," then so be it.
If I were you, I would modify your remarks to remove your allusions to Sen. Obama's "ineptness" and "arrogance" since you are unable to support either of those charges.
Just call him an inexperienced man who lacks guts and you'll have done well for yourself.
Bjaarki
|
Nice try my man. But his ineptitude stems from his lack of experience and his lack of guts In this context, they go hand in hand. To be president you must make decisions. Repeatedly changing positions and stances on issues makes you inept as a politician. The charge stands. You lose. Sorry bro.
And you want examples of arrogance. OK. How about the columns behind him during his convention speech for one? That doesn't reek of hubris to you? Is he standing on Olympus?